Custom Anti Roll Bar- Cheap opportunity!

Dangermouse said:
[
quattro said:
Mine is a 1" bar with machined 11/16" ends and it makes a remarkable difference.It cost me £200.00 a few years ago, and is worth every penny of it.Richard

That sounds like it working in real life.

Dave

Well if you have to spend £200 for it I don't call it a roaring success. I thought this was the " Custom Anti Roll Bar- Cheap opportunity! " thread, not the " very expensive for a subjective effect" thread. That is my last post on this, I've said my bit and that's that .[/quote]

The cost of it has nothing to do with its efficiency. I can afford it, it works very well and it was worth the money.

I bought it back in early 2009, well before this thread started. viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5181&start=0&hilit=anti+roll

After 5 years of use, it still amazes me when flicking through mini roundabouts.

Richard
 
and to think that's good when you compare it to Mr Quattro's daily drive means it really does make a difference...
 
I am quite happy to confirm a marked reduction in dip and dive once the ARB was installed in my car making it far more round'a'bout friendly.

My 200 odd NZ dollars (approx 100 pound) was well spent and were it even 3 or 4 times more I would think it to be money well spent.
It is not often that you can improve the overall handling characteristics of a car with so little money time and ease of application.
Perhaps others may think an ARB equates to a set of fluffy dice? or extra gauges and bling however I believe that any improvement in handling and driving safety such as this ARB represents is the sort of purchase that may just A: possibly save your bacon in a tricky situation and B: makes the whole P6 driving experience even better, and that after all is what owning a classic like the P6 is all about.


Graeme
 
Hi,

All the math is really saying is that you should consider the long bar as lots of very small sections. The total twist on the bar will act upon each of these sections; the reaction (how much it resists the twist) of each section will be dependent on its geometry. Thick sections will be stiffer than thin ones but the overall effect is the some of these reactions, not just the lowest, this is NOT a weakest link in the chain thing. The new bar will be significantly stiffer than the standard one despite having cross sections equivalent to the standard bar at each end.

Gavin might come along in a minute and explain it better :roll:

Thanks, Tim
 
Looking at Stans supplied chart for different bar thicknesses I think it would be more desirable to go to an even fatter bar in the order of 1 1/4 to 1 3/8 however that would mean some playing about with the mounting structure and as this discussion has hi-lighted the 19mm mount points do represent a weak point in the bar anyway so changing them whilst more difficult to do however the rewards would be greater.

Graeme
 
ghce said:
I am quite happy to confirm a marked reduction in dip and dive once the ARB was installed in my car making it far more round'a'bout friendly.

My 200 odd NZ dollars (approx 100 pound) was well spent and were it even 3 or 4 times more I would think it to be money well spent.
It is not often that you can improve the overall handling characteristics of a car with so little money time and ease of application.
Perhaps others may think an ARB equates to a set of fluffy dice? or extra gauges and bling however I believe that any improvement in handling and driving safety such as this ARB represents is the sort of purchase that may just A: possibly save your bacon in a tricky situation and B: makes the whole P6 driving experience even better, and that after all is what owning a classic like the P6 is all about.


Graeme

My experience exactly . I was only waiting for someone to come along with a more eloquent style .
In my speak I would have said " bloody marvellous , what are ya waiting for ?"
thanks Graeme
 
I certainly would be interested to hear more from Vaultsman as to how much difference he believes the uprated bar has made.
 
rp61973 said:
I certainly would be interested to hear more from Vaultsman as to how much difference he believes the uprated bar has made.

vaultsman said:
It's fine, Rich.

Although there's some roll compared with a modern, there's definitely less than with the original but still in keeping with the car.

Stan

vaultsman said:
Took Occie for a 20-mile run yesterday, incorporating some 50-60mph curves and fast-ish roundabouts.

Similarly to Graeme's experience with the Bygone Auto ARB body roll is still more than a modern, but I wouldn't want to lose all of it anyway as (for me at least) that's an integral part of the P6.

That said, I did notice a reduction in the roll and the car felt noticeably tauter.

I think Tim and Gavin's car will still be the favoured test bed for a dispassionate view, after Bowes in a couple of weeks.

Stan

I'm sure everyone who's following this thread (and the supplier :) ) are keen to know whether it's worth proceeding beyond the sample bar. At the moment, I'm trying not to influence Tim & Gavin's views too much...so suffice to say at the moment I'm happy with what I've found.

The bar's on the way to Northern Ireland as I type...I'm expecting delivery there on Wednesday.

Stan
 
Just a quick update to let everyone know this hasn't died.

I've been in touch with Tim, who tells me he's moving house at the moment and things are a bit chaotic as a result.

Once things start to get back to normal he'll let us have some feedback.


Stan
 
For what it is worth, when I upgraded my bar to a 22mm one, the difference was dramatic...much more decisive at the front in terms of a better feeling of control and security. The character of the car was not lost...in fact I felt it was enhanced in a focused, confident sort of way. And the ride was not affected as it is with poly bushes. The 22mm bar is of course a 3mm increase from standard, so the 24mm bar on offer here would only sharpen these gains again I would imagine.
My bar was $200 from memory and was definitely worth it. At the time, a 24mm bar was available from the U.K, but was prohibitively expensive, and I happened upon this bar for sale as the last of a lot that was manufactured by a gent who raced/rallied a P6 and had them engineered himself. He made them in batches of ten and this was the last of a batch that had been lying about for a while.
 
Hi All,

Firstly let me apologize for the length of time it's taken me to review this ABR, as I write it is still not on the car but will be by the weekend, I'm sure it will function well as the "science" is right.

Our next scheduled event, which will certainly test it's durability, will hopefully be the Circuit Retro, "The Retro" appears on the ANICC calender for the weekend of the 10th, 11th and 12th October although I can find little else about it at the moment other than this calender entry :?: If this fails to run we'll find some lane event or the likes to do :D

Thanks, Tim
 
I've had a 23mm bar fitted to my car for years and it works wonderfully, cures the body role but leaves the handling alone. The Hex is only machined to just past the clamp by about 2 mm. I do a lot of dirt driving and found that The clamping bolts kept snapping. I fixed this by going one size up. It is machined on centre and yes it is awfully close to the inner link bush but doesn't hit it. I'd be a bit worried that a 25mm bar will wear the shock absorbers pretty quick. I know from experience that three hours of driving on rough roads is about the limit before they go off and driving becomes hard work. Harder springing will make them work even harder.
 
Hi,

The test bar is fitted to our Road Rally car. The plan is for the car and Gavin to compete in the UAC Circuit Retro Targa rally on the 11th Oct, I unfortunately have family commitments that day.

I think the benefits of a much stiffer front ABR have been well reviewed in this thread by those that have them fitted, our car is significantly modified now and therefore I don't if there is much our review will be able to add to these reviews/findings, however the bar will get a serious durability test on our car :shock:

We'll report back as soon as we can after the event.

Thanks, Tim
 
Kman1600 said:
Hi,

The test bar is fitted to our Road Rally car. The plan is for the car and Gavin to compete in the UAC Circuit Retro Targa rally on the 11th Oct, I unfortunately have family commitments that day.

I think the benefits of a much stiffer front ABR have been well reviewed in this thread by those that have them fitted, our car is significantly modified now and therefore I don't if there is much our review will be able to add to these reviews/findings, however the bar will get a serious durability test on our car :shock:

We'll report back as soon as we can after the event.

Thanks, Tim

Thanks for the update, Tim.

Look forward to hearing your views after the 11th. Whilst the theory supports the debates in this thread, a serious real-world trial will be very interesting to all.

Stan
 
Hi,

Firstly an apology for the length of time it’s taken to get to the point of reviewing this ABR, you make plans and then life gets in the way, anyway it’s on the car and I’ve driven it!!! :shock:

The bar is very well made, radius’s are as large as are practical (good for fatigue resistance) and the fit is excellent. Please note the area of the inner wings of our car have already been opened up slightly to provide clearance around our previous ABR, it appears some cars need this and some don’t, each car is different, in fact each side of each car is different. Bare this in mind if you order one, any extra clearance needed will be small and easily achieve with a little gentle tin bashing/jacking.

On the road the transformation is remarkable; please understand that our car is quite modified now so it is difficult (impossible) to assess this modification in isolation but even compared to our previous 24mm bar this 25.4mm the feel is different, even less roll in the corners. Considering “normal” driving, the bar modernises the feel of the car, you’ll have to decide yourself if that’s a good thing or not? Gone is the rolling nature of the drive, replaced by a much flatter attitude, as I say much more like a modern car would be.

OK so with all of the above said should we all rush out now and order one? Unfortunately a question that sounds as simple as this is surprisingly hard to actually answer. To make an attempt to answer it we need to go through a few things regarding P6 handling and more specifically what the front end is doing. Gavin is way more up on all this stuff than me but this is the just of things, he may come along and elaborate or correct me :oops:

Lack of front camber recovery in roll is a big issue with the front suspension geometry, ie when the car rolls the geometry of the front suspension fails to correct for this and the front wheel tucks in under the car and it understeers. This can be seen in the picture below (24mm bar fitted), this eats tires as well as losing loads of time, and it also feels very disconcerting as the bloody thing just won’t turn!!! Increasing the roll stiffness at the front has an obvious effect on this, more stiffness = less roll = less wheel tucking in = better turning = improved times, which is all good :LOL: but unfortunately the front suspension is not working in isolation. A much stiffer front end, and this 25.4mm bar increases it by some 220% over standard, will increase weight transfer at the front which in turn reduces grip and will result in increased understeer. So we have two opposing effects contributing to our original goal of improved handling :evil: With our car we have increase rear spring rates so we have stiffened the rear as well so this lessens the weight transfer effect so we can take full benefit of the improved camber control without so much of the negative issues.

It is extremely hard to know how an otherwise standard car would handle with just this ABR fitted, my gut feel is that it may well be too stiff and all though the car would indeed roll less in the corners overall front end grip might actually be worse.

To most on here all of this is of little consequence as we are talking at the limit handling here, if you fit this bar and drive the car well within its limit all you will notice is the much reduced body roll, which will make it feel more modern. If you want to get the best out of it then fit in along with stronger rear springs, for an otherwise standard car it might be worth considering a mid-stiffness bar. A 22mm bar has been talked about, this might be more appropriate for an otherwise standard car, for reference torsional stiffness percentages over “standard” are listed below (Gav. feel free to check my math :?: ):
22mm bar 145%
24mm bar 188%
25.4mm bar 223%
If you go with stronger rear springs then obviously you can move towards the stiffer bars.

Please understand this is not an exhaustive scientific test, just the best we can do with short run time and limited resources, it would be nice to do back to back trials with various diameter options. The event on the 11th was in fact cancelled due to lack of entries so we are still seeking a full anger event to run on. The above is a review of our observations so far.

On a side note our car went through the MOT this morning without issue, MOT’s here are all state run, no garages, there is no “advisory” process it’s either right and passes or it fails. As most will know our car is no oil painting but it’s right in all the right places :wink: it’s nice to see that the look didn't prejudice the test

All for now, Tim
 

Attachments

  • Not the Boxing....2011.jpg
    Not the Boxing....2011.jpg
    150.3 KB · Views: 705
Awesome stuff - thanks for the update. Impressive seeing the tyres being made to prove their worth...
 
Back
Top