According to the temperature gauge, my 1972 2000 TC runs hotter than it should – mostly at the top end of the green section, and past the 85-degree mid-point. I have renewed the thermostat (82deg), the temperature sender and the voltage stabiliser (now a solid-state one), and the reading hasn't changed. The engine runs fine and doesn't give the impression of being excessively hot, but I'm wondering if the radiator might not be as efficient as it should be. (Or the gauge could be faulty, which I will attempt to check with an infra-red thermometer.)
The gentleman from whom I bought the Rover had the radiator rebuilt in 2018, and it's free of sludge and scale. It has a surprisingly thin core, though. Might it be too thin to do the job?
Could one of you with a crossflow-rad four-cylinder Series Two please measure the thickness of the radiator core? If mine (1 3/16in) proves to be thinner, then I could think about getting the radiator rebuilt with a thicker core.
A further thought. The factory manual says that the 2000 was originally fitted with a 77-degree thermostat, nowadays hard to find. Might it be a good idea to fit a 74-degree one, which would be fully open at about 79 degrees, rather than the more commonly used 82-degree one? A hotter engine is a more efficient engine up to a point, but assuming my temp gauge isn't lying I'd rather the needle sat in the middle or just below once the engine is fully warmed up.
Many thanks, John
The gentleman from whom I bought the Rover had the radiator rebuilt in 2018, and it's free of sludge and scale. It has a surprisingly thin core, though. Might it be too thin to do the job?
Could one of you with a crossflow-rad four-cylinder Series Two please measure the thickness of the radiator core? If mine (1 3/16in) proves to be thinner, then I could think about getting the radiator rebuilt with a thicker core.
A further thought. The factory manual says that the 2000 was originally fitted with a 77-degree thermostat, nowadays hard to find. Might it be a good idea to fit a 74-degree one, which would be fully open at about 79 degrees, rather than the more commonly used 82-degree one? A hotter engine is a more efficient engine up to a point, but assuming my temp gauge isn't lying I'd rather the needle sat in the middle or just below once the engine is fully warmed up.
Many thanks, John
Last edited: